The Arguments That Don’t Even Bother to Hide Their Homophobia

Although we must look closely to identify the homophobia inherent in certain arguments against homosexual wedding, with other people the prejudice is scarcely disguised after all.

“I am worried about the effect homosexual marriage will have on society/schools. ”

There’s absolutely no concern right right here, just prejudice. We could conclude this since there is simply no proof to recommend marriage that is gay damage culture. Have actually the 11 nations where marriage that is gay legal crumbled yet? Finally the argument actually is nonsense that is hyperbolic to instil confusion, fear, and mistrust of gay individuals.

“Gay marriage is immoral. ”

When there is one thing immoral about legitimately acknowledging the love between two adults that are consenting it can assist the argument to mention just what that is. “God says so” just isn’t a disagreement. And also this article, Cardinal Keith O’Brien, could be the genuine “grotesque subversion of the universally accepted right” that is human.

“Gay people shouldn’t be permitted to marry since they’re more prone to be promiscuous. ”

This claim is dependant on the degrading preconception that homosexual people usually do not feel real love and just have actually sex with as many individuals as you possibly can. It’s also near the point – right partners are not precluded from wedding regarding the foundation they could be unfaithful, so just why should people that are gay?

“I adore my companion, my buddy and my dog. That doesn’t suggest we ought to have the proper to marry. ”

Thank you for reducing the love we have actually for my partner that is long-term to, incest or bestiality. Might also make the kind: “The state really should not be blessing every intimate union. ”Thank you, once more, for reducing my long-lasting, loving relationship to simply intercourse.

The Truly Silly Homophobic Arguments

“God made Adam and Eve, maybe maybe maybe not Adam and Steve.

Plainly maybe perhaps not just a Biology graduate.

“If everyone ended up being homosexual, mankind would vanish. ”

Ignoring the actual fact not everybody is homosexual, as well as ignoring the very fact people that are gay and do have kiddies through donors and surrogates, We really quite enjoyed the apocalyptic pictures this argument conjured.

“Gay rights are stylish at this time. ”

The Suffragettes famously marched together because an excuse was needed by them to compare clothes. Civil liberties activists seemed fabulous with hoses and firearms switched on them. Nooses around homosexual necks that are iranian totally “in” now. We all have been simple lambs of our Queen Gaga.

Individuals really utilize this argument.

“The only people who desire gay wedding would be the liberal elites. ”

If it was actually real, the reason a huge selection of each and every day homosexual individuals protest outside anti-gay marriage rallies? The reason 1000s of people voice their help for homosexual wedding in polls? I really do perhaps perhaps perhaps not imagine there are lots of individuals who think they deserve less liberties or who want become citizens that are second-class.

“Gay individuals never also desire wedding. ”

Yes, Ann Widdecombe, we do. We try not to appreciate you mischaracterising exactly what an incredible number of us do and never desire, and squaring truth to match your Catholic bigotry.

“Gay people can currently get married – to folks of the exact opposite gender. ”

This really is Michele Bachmann’s demented logic. Yes, homosexual individuals can currently get hitched … to folks of the gender that is opposite. No, they’re not permitted to marry the individuals they really hottest babes

love. It is not simply bigotry, it is additionally stupidity.

“There may be extreme consequences for culture if we accept homosexual wedding. ”

Or even to place it one other way: in peace. “If you don’t stop all of this ridiculous talk, I will be forced to disappear completely and then leave you” Scary!

“Gay marriage will result in polygamy/bestiality/paedophilia/etc. ”

The truth is that the legalisation of homosexual wedding shall resulted in legalisation of homosexual wedding. Dire warnings of slippery slopes are scaremongering. When you look at the nations that have up to now legalised marriage that is same-sex courts have actually constantly refused phone telephone telephone calls when it comes to legalisation of polygamy.

“Gay marriage caused the finish for the Roman Empire/September 11th/etc. ”

The Roman Empire disintegrated as barbarians from the north overloaded them, forcing the final Roman emperor, Romulus Augustus, to abdicate towards the Germanic warlord Odoacer. This had nothing in connection with homosexuality.

The assaults regarding the World Trade Center had been orchestrated by Al-Qaeda, an extremist Muslim team that detests America. The homosexual mafia ended up being perhaps not included.

“You are way too emotionally involved to create a logical argument. ”

Of course I’m furious. Wouldn’t you be in the event that you had to tune in to arguments such as these? I’m passionate about achieving equality and fighting prejudice. But, as everyone else ought to know, passion and explanation are complementary.

“We are in a crisis that is economic therefore we shouldn’t be wasting time on homosexual wedding. ”

Will it be a lot to want politicians who are able to multi-task? As well as leaders whom don’t consider equality an extravagance increase?


So that they can portray their campaign to “preserve old-fashioned wedding” as reasoned and unprejudiced, the previous Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey has argued that supporters of homosexual wedding shouldn’t turn to name-calling and accusations of bigotry. Then again he could be a homophobe and a bigot. There isn’t just a single one of their arguments that doesn’t indicate the reduced state of homosexuals, or provide to justify the discrimination.

In reality the current federal government proposals are just for the legalisation of civil same-sex marriage, nor permit ceremonies become carried out on spiritual web web internet sites. It really is a proposal that is entirely secular yet Carey and different churches and church-goers are keen to help make the civil liberties of homosexuals their company. Provided centuries of spiritual persecution of homosexual individuals it really is completely justified to call Lord Carey, the Coalition for Marriage, Christian Concern, and all sorts of other proactive opponents of homosexual marriage “bigots” and their arguments homophobic.

This informative article ended up being taken to you by brand New Humanist, a quarterly log of some ideas, science and tradition. To guide our journalism, please subscribe.